李福堂,黄卫,陈海霞,仲学哲
LI Futang,HUANG Wei,CHEN Haixia,ZHONG Xuezhe

• 1:中国石油冀东油田公司勘探开发研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

煤层气井产能预测中仅考虑应力敏感效应而忽略基质孔隙收缩效应导致产能评价误差较大。在分析非达西作用、煤基质收缩作用的基础上，建立了考虑孔隙压缩及煤基质收缩效应的煤层气产能预测模型。结果表明：考虑非达西效应的煤层气井产量明显低于不考虑非达西效应的产量，并且随着生产压差的增大，二者之间的产量差异逐渐扩大；煤层气井井底流压的减小会导致生产压差增加，相应煤层气井的产量增大幅度下降；无论考虑非达西效应与否，随着生产压差的增大，产量差值逐渐增大；随着孔隙压缩系数的增大，煤层相对渗透率逐渐降低，并且相对渗透率与生产压差呈线性关系。实例验证表明，新的产能预测模型比Eclipse模型更接近实际产气量。研究成果可为煤层气井产能预测影响因素分析提供理论指导与技术参考。
Coalbed methane well productivity prediction only considering stress sensitivity effect while ignoring matrix pore shrinkage effect result in much error in productivity evaluation. Based on analysis of non-Darcy effect and coal matrix shrinkage, coalbed methane productivity prediction model is established considering pore compressibility and coal matrix shrinkage. The results show that coalbed methane well production considering non-Darcy effect is significantly lower than that without considering non-Darcy effect, and the production difference between them increases gradually with the increase of production pressure difference. Bottom hole pressure decrease of coalbed methane well causes increase of production pressure difference and reduction of production increase range of corresponding coalbed methane well. Whether taking non-Darcy effect into account or not, production difference increases gradually as production pressure difference increases. With the increase of pore compressibility coefficient, relative permeability of coal bed decreases gradually,appearing as linear relationship with production pressure difference. Case verification shows that productivity prediction by the new mode is closer to actual gas production than Eclipse model. The research provides theoretical guidance and technical reference for analysis of influencing factors of coalbed methane well productivity prediction.

关键词(KeyWords)： 孔隙压缩;煤基质收缩;非达西效应;产能方程;煤层气
pore compressibility;coal matrix shrinkage;non-Darcy effect;productivity equation;coalbed methane

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 李福堂,黄卫,陈海霞,仲学哲
LI Futang,HUANG Wei,CHEN Haixia,ZHONG Xuezhe

DOI: 10.19597/j.issn.1000-3754.202212029

参考文献(References)：

• [1]曹明亮，邓泽，康永尚，等.煤样渗透率有效应力与基质收缩双重耦合效应及其与煤阶关系[J].地质论评，2022,68(5):1863-1870.CAO Mingliang,DENG Ze,KANG Yongshang,et al.The dual coupling effect of coal sample permeability effective stress and matrix shrinkage and its relationship with coal rank[J].Geological Review,2022,68(5):1863-1870.
• [2]涂志民，王兴刚，车延前，等.三塘湖盆地低阶煤煤层气成藏主控因素[J].新疆石油地质，2021,42(6):676-682.TU Zhimin,WANG Xinggang,CHE Yanqian,et al.Controlling factors on CBM accumulation in low-rank coal in Santanghu basin[J].Xinjiang Petroleum Geology,2021,42(6):676-682.
• [3]何发岐，董昭雄.深部煤层气资源开发潜力：以鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田为例[J].石油与天然气地质，2022,43(2):277-285.HE Faqi,DONG Zhaoxiong.Development potential of deep coalbed methane:A case study in the Daniudi gas field,Ordos Basin[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2022,43(2):277-285.
• [4]王勃，梁兴，马斌，等.川南筠连地区煤层气地质特征与富集规律[J].断块油气田，2021,28(3):311-317.WANG Bo,LIANG Xing,MA Bin,et al.Geological characteristics and enrichment rule of the CBM in Junlian area of southern Sichuan[J]. Fault-Block Oil&Gas Field, 2021, 28(3):311-317.
• [5]闵超，代博仁，石咏衡，等.基于聚类匹配的煤层气压裂效果主控因素识别[J].特种油气藏，2022,29(4):135-141.MIN Chao, DAI Boren, SHI Yongheng, et al. Identification of main controlling factors of coalbed methane fracturing effect based on cluster matching[J].Special Oil&Gas Reserviors, 2022,29(4):135-141.
• [6] SCOTT A R,KAISER W R.Hydrogeologic factor affecting dynamic open-hole cavity complections in the San Juan basin[C].Tuscaloosa:Coalbed Methane Symposium,1995.
• [7]王宇，李治平，刘超.基于分形与ARIMA的煤层气产量预测[J].天然气与石油，2011,29(3):45-48.WANG Yu, LI Zhiping, LIU Chao. Prediction for coal bed gas output based on fractal and ARIMA[J]. Natural Gas and Oil,2011,29(3):45-48.
• [8]罗山强，郎兆新，张丽华.影响煤层气井产能因素的初步研究[J].断块油气田，1997,4(1):42-47.LUO Shanqiang, LANG Zhaoxin, ZHANG Lihua. A primary study of factors influencing coalbed gas productivity[J].FaultBlock Oil&Gas Field,1997,4(1):42-47.
• [9]娄剑青.影响煤层气井产量的因素分析[J].天然气工业，2004,24(2):62-64.LOU Jianqing.Factors of influencing production of coal-bed wells[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(2):62-64.
• [10]岑学齐，吴晓东，梁伟，等.煤层气井产能影响因素分析[J].科学技术与工程，2014,14(4):201-204.CEN Xueqi,WU Xiaodong,LIANG Wei,et al.Analysis of factors affecting productivity of coalbed gas wells[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2014,14(4):201-204.
• [11]马飞英.JL煤田煤层气井产能主控因素研究[D].成都：西南石油大学，2014.MA Feiying.The study of main influence factors on productivity of coalbed methane well in JL coalfield[D].Chengdu:Southewest Petroleum University,2014.
• [12]冯青，陶洪华，黄子俊，等.变渗透率条件下煤层气井的产能预测[J].煤田地质与勘探，2017,45(1):62-66.FENG Qing,TAO Honghua,HUANG Zijun,et al.Prediction of CBM well productivity under variable permeability[J]. Coal Geology&Exploration,2017,45(1):62-66.
• [13]郭肖.多煤层气井产能预测及生产参数优化[D].北京：中国石油大学（北京），2019.GUO Xiao. Production prediction of multilayered CBM reservoirs and optimization of production strategy[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2019.
• [14]张争光.滇东黔西煤层气井产能差异的控制因素[D].徐州.中国矿业大学，2022.ZHANG Zhengguang.Controlling factors of productivity difference of coalbed methane wells in eastern Yunnan and western Guizhou[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology,2022.
• [15]裴柏林，郝杰，张遂安，等.煤基质膨胀收缩对储层渗透率影响的新数学模型[J].煤田地质与勘探，2017,45(1):51-55.PEI Bailin,HAO Jie,ZHANG Suian,et al.New mathematical model of the influence of coal matrix swelling and shrinkage on reservoir permeability[J].Coal Geology&Exploration,2017,45(1):51-55.
• [16]万晓龙，王思仪，郭西峰，等.基于应力敏感与基质收缩效应的低渗油藏数值模拟方法及应用[J].特种油气藏，2022,29(2):110-114.WAN Xiaolong, WANG Siyi, GUO Xifeng, et al. Numerical modeling method of low-permeability reservoir based on stress sensitivity and matrix shrinkage effect and its application[J].Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs,2022,29(2):110-114.
• [17]张先敏，同登科.考虑基质收缩影响的煤层气流动模型及应用[J].中国科学E辑：技术科学，2008,38(5):790-796.ZHANG Xianmin, TONG Dengke. Coal-bed gas flow model and its application about considering the effect of matrix shrinkage[J].Science in China Series E:Technological Sciences,2008,38(5):790-796.
• [18]付玉，郭肖，贾英，等.煤基质收缩对裂隙渗透率影响的新数学模型[J].天然气工业，2005,25(2):143-145.FU Yu, GUO Xiao, JIA Ying, et al. New mathematical model for effect of coal matrix shrinkage on fracture permeability[J].Natural Gas Industry,2005,25(2):143-145.
• [19]刘曰武，苏中良，方虹斌，等.煤层气的解吸/吸附机理研究综述[J].油气井测试，2010,19(6):37-44.LIU Yuewu,SU Zhongliang,FANG Hongbin,et al.Review on CBM desorption/adsorption mechanism[J]. Well Testing,2010,19(6):37-44.
• [20]周军平，鲜学福，姜永东，等.考虑有效应力和煤基质收缩效应的渗透率模型[J].西南石油大学学报（自然科学版），2009,31(1):4-8.ZHOU Junping,XIAN Xuefu,JIANG Yongdong,et al.A permeability model considering the effective stress and coal matrix shrinking effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science&Technology Edition),2009,31(1):4-8.
• [21]吴俊.煤表面能的吸附法计算及研究意义[J].煤田地质与勘探，1994,22(2):18-23.WU Jun.Coal absorption method of calculation-coal surface energy and its significace[J].Coal Geology&Exploration,1994,22(2):18-23.
• [22]亚当森A W.表面的物理化学[M].北京：科学出版社，1984.ADAMSON A W. Physical chemistry of surfaces[M].Beijing:Science Press,1984.
• [23]谈慕华，黄蕴元.表面物理化学[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，1985.TAN Muhua,Huang Yunyuan.Surface physical chemistry[M].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,1985.
• [24]何学秋，王恩元，林海燕.孔隙气体对煤体变形及蚀损作用机理[J].中国矿业大学学报，1996,25(1):6-11.HE Xueqiu,WANG Enyuan,LIN Haiyan.Coal deformation and fracture mechanism under pore gas action[J].Journal of China University of Mining&Technology,1996,25(1):6-11.
• [25] SEIDLE J R,HUIT L G.Experimental measurement of coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption and implications for cleat permeability increases[R].SPE 30010,1995.
• [26] SCHWERER F C, PAVONE A M. Effect of pressure-dependent permeability on well-test analyses and long-term production of methane from coal seams[R].SPE 12857,1984.
• [27]孟召平，张纪星，刘贺，等.考虑应力敏感性的煤层气井产能模型及应用分析[J].煤炭学报，2014,39(4):593-599.MENG Zhaoping, ZHANG Jixing, LIU He, et al. Productivity model of CBM wells considering the stress sensitivity and its application analysis[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(4):593-599.
• [28]罗瑞兰.深层气藏介质变形渗流机理及气藏工程应用研究[D].北京：中国石油大学（北京），2006.LUO Ruilan.A study of deformation and percolation mechanisms of deep gas reservoir and its application[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing),2006.
• [29]郭煜锴，刘德华，赵楠，等.水平气井流入动态计算新方法研究[J].石油天然气学报，2009,31(1):118-120.GUO Yukai, LIU Dehua, ZHAO Nan, et al.Study on the new calculation method of inflow performance relationship of horizontal gas well[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009, 31(1):118-120.