刘江,李广菊,刘江玉,敖德逵,李砚明,赵丽娟
LIU Jiang,LI Guangju,LIU Jiangyu,AO Dekui,LI Yanming,ZHAO Lijuan

• 1:大庆钻探工程公司测井公司
• 2:大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

随着油田开发的不断深人,尤其是在化学驱后,老油田挖潜目标、开发方式调整及水淹层测井的表现方式更趋复杂,解释难度也越来越大。经取心井资料统计分析,总结出高含水后期水淹层解释难点:薄差油层开发和化学驱使部分油层孔隙压力增大或放射性异常及相应的测井响应异常且无理论校正方法;大多数测井方法由于垂向分辨率的限制,满足不了薄层及厚层细分精细解释的要求;由于驱替方式的变化,水淹层中导电流体的含盐度起伏不定,地层水电阻率问题一直没有得到有效解决;化学驱水淹机理与测井响应特征不很清楚。从以往可行性探索实例出发,提出了这4个问题的处理设想和今后研究方向,供测井解释及方法研究人员参考。
With an oilfield development,especially after chemical flooding,it is necessary for the oilfield to adjust the potential-tapping targets and development patterns.The well-logging presenting forms of the waterflooded reservoirs are rather complicated and the interpretation is more and more difficult.Through statistically analyzing the core data,four interpretation difficulties are summarized at high-water-cut late period;thin-and-poor oil layer development and chemical flooding produce the pore-pressure increase of partial oil reservoirs and radioactive anomaly,the well-logging responses are abnormal and more seriously with no theoretical correcting method;due to the limitation of vertical resolution,most logging methods cannot meet the requirements of fine and detailed interpretation;the flooding pattern change leads to the unsteady alteration of the salinity for the conducting fluids in water-flooded layers,the formation-resistivity problem is not effectively solved all the time;both the chemical flooding mechanism and logging responses are not made clear.By the previous feasibility exploration cases,the processing considerations and further research direction are put forward to provide references for those logging interpretation and method research fellows.

关键词(KeyWords)： 水淹层测井;化学驱;老区挖潜;地层水电阻率
water-flooded-layer logging;chemical flooding;old-block-potential-tapping;formation-water resistivity

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 刘江,李广菊,刘江玉,敖德逵,李砚明,赵丽娟
LIU Jiang,LI Guangju,LIU Jiangyu,AO Dekui,LI Yanming,ZHAO Lijuan

参考文献(References)：

• [1]慈建发,何世明,李振英,等.水淹层测井发展现状与未来[J].天然气工业,2005,25(7):44-46.
• [2]李剑浩.用混合物电导率公式改进双水模型的公式[J].测井技术,2007,31(1):110-112.
• [3]韩学辉,匡立春,代诗华,等.润湿性对计算地层含水饱和度影响[J].测井技术,2004,28(6):478-481.
• [4]杨景强,马宏宇,刘如红,等.对水淹层测井评价中几个问题的认识[J].测井技术,2009,33(6):511-516.
• [5]高楚桥,李先鹏.温度与压力对岩石物性和电性影响实验研究[J].测井技术,2003,27(2):110-112.
• [6]赵培华.油田开发水淹层测井技术[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2003:1-4.
• [7]陈德坡,张兴平,李奋,等.聚合物水淹层测井响应特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(6):123-127.
• [8]谢荣华.大庆油田近10年测井技术进展及发展方向[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(5):253-259.
• [9]卢艳.聚合物驱岩石复电阻率频散特性[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(2):138-142.
• [10]于春华,陈彬,赵伟新,等.利用过滤电位估算地层压力[J].测井技术,2004,28(5):462-467.
• [11]王美珍,俞军.用测井资料确定大庆长垣水淹层混合液电阻率[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(2):120-122.
• [12]刘传平,杨青山,杨景强,等.薄差层水淹层测井解释技术研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):118-119.
• [13]雍世和,张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释[M].北京:中国石油大学出版社,2003.
• [14]许敬彦,李庆峰,丁明海.自然电位曲线异常原因分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(5):63-65.
• [15]杨景强,樊太亮,马宏宇,等.不同韵律性油层水淹层测井定性识别方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(1):134-138.
• [16]康志勇,王永祥,郑德文,等.岩石电阻增大率和地层因素方程的基本形式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(4):160-162.