大庆石油地质与开发

2016, v.35;No.173(01) 76-79

[打印本页] [关闭]
本期目录(Current Issue) | 过刊浏览(Archive) | 高级检索(Advanced Search)

孔隙度、渗透率测定结果差异性
DIFFERENCES IN THE TESTED RESULTS OF THE POROSITY AND PERMEABILITY

刘淑芹,汪秀一,徐喜庆,李丽丽,陈艺策
LIU Shuqin,WANG Xiuyi,XU Xiqing,LI Lili,CHEN Yice

摘要(Abstract):

孔隙度、渗透率测试技术和仪器不同,测试结果存在一定差异。采用不同仪器对松辽盆地北部不同层位63块样品的孔隙度和渗透率分别进行了测试并探寻其相关关系。结果表明:在覆压接近条件下,不同仪器孔隙度的测量结果相差不大,而渗透率的测量结果差异较大,渗透率越小,差别越大。
Due to the different adopted testing techniques and instruments of the porosity and permeability,the results are various as well.The porosities and permeabilities of 63 samples from different horizons in North Songliao Basin are detected respectively by means of different instruments,and moreover their correlation relationships are also explored.The achievements show that under the similar overburden pressure,the discrepancies of the porosity tested results are not large.On the contrary,those of the permeability test results are rather serious,the smaller the permeability is,the greater difference will be.

关键词(KeyWords): ECK-2;CMS-300;渗透率;孔隙度;低渗透油田;滑脱系数
ECK-2;CMS-300;permeability;porosity;low-permeability oilfield;slip factor

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中国石油股份有限公司基金项目“特低渗油藏有效开发技术”(2011ZX05013006)

作者(Author): 刘淑芹,汪秀一,徐喜庆,李丽丽,陈艺策
LIU Shuqin,WANG Xiuyi,XU Xiqing,LI Lili,CHEN Yice

参考文献(References):

扩展功能
本文信息
服务与反馈
本文关键词相关文章
本文作者相关文章
中国知网
分享