王梦,康昆,龙浩,李鸿明,李文佳,周津宇,赖娟
WANG Meng,KANG Kun,LONG Hao,LI Hongming,LI Wenjia,ZHOU Jinyu,LAI Juan

• 1:中国石油集团东方地球物理勘探有限责任公司西南物探研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

总有机碳含量(w(TOC))是评价页岩气储层生烃能力的重要指标,也是页岩气甜点预测的关键参数之一。页岩气储层w(TOC)地震定量预测是通过地震岩石物理分析,优选储层w(TOC)敏感参数,得到基于地震弹性参数的w(TOC)计算模型;通过全道集叠前反演获得高精度弹性参数反演数据体,根据计算模型将反演数据体转换为w(TOC)数据体,从而定量预测页岩气储层w(TOC)的空间展布。应用该方法对四川盆地LZ区块上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩气储层w(TOC)空间展布进行了研究。结果表明:基于全道集的叠前反演技术充分利用叠前道集中的AVO信息刻画出储层内部特征变化,有效提高弹性参数的反演精度;确定密度为LZ区块w(TOC)的敏感参数,结合全道集叠前密度反演获得w(TOC)数据体,预测出五峰组—龙一_1亚段储层w(TOC)空间及平面分布;LZ区块6口井w(TOC)地震定量预测结果与测井解释结果对比,相对误差均小于5%。页岩气储层w(TOC)地震定量预测方法能有效预测w(TOC)的空间分布,为页岩气开发设计提供可靠依据。
Total organic carbon content w(TOC) is an important indicator to evaluate the hydrocarbon generation capacity of shale gas reservoirs, and also one of the key parameters for the shale-gas sweet-spot prediction. Through the seismic petrophysical analysis, the w(TOC) sensitive parameters of the shale gas reservoirs were optimized to obtain the w(TOC) calculating model based on the seismic elastic parameters, thus the seismic quantitative prediction of the w(TOC) of the reservoirs was conducted. By means of the all-gather prestack inversion, the high-precision seismic elastic parameter inversion data volume was converted, and then was changed into one of the w(TOC)according to the calculating model, so as to quantitatively predict the spatial distribution of the w(TOC) in the shale gas reservoirs. The method was applied in the study on the spatial distribution of the w(TOC) of the shale gas reservoirs in Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Block LZ of Sichuan Basin. The results show that with the help of all-gather prestack inverting technique, making full use of the AVO information in the prestack gather, the changes of the internal characteristics of the reservoirs were figured out, thus the inversion precision of the elastic parameters was effectively enhanced. The density was determined to be the sensitive parameter for the w(TOC) in Block LZ, and the w(TOC) data volume was obtained by integrating with the all-gather prestack density inversion, and moreover the spatial and planar distributions of the w(TOC) from Wufeng Fm(O_3w) to L1,submember of Longmaxi Fm(S_1l_1~1) were predicted. The comparison between the seismic quantitative result and the well logging interpretation for the w(TOC) in six wells in Block LZ shows that the relative errors are all less than 5%. The seismic quantitative prediction method of the w(TOC) in the shale gas reservoirs can effectively predict the spatial distribution of the w(TOC), which provides the reliable evidence for the shale gas development design.

关键词(KeyWords)： 页岩气;w(TOC)地震定量预测;全道集叠前反演;岩石物理分析;密度
shale gas;w(TOC) seismic quantitative prediction;all-gather prestack inversion;petrophysical analysis;density

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): “十三五”国家科技重大专项“大型油气田及煤层气开发”(2016ZX05062001)

作者(Author): 王梦,康昆,龙浩,李鸿明,李文佳,周津宇,赖娟
WANG Meng,KANG Kun,LONG Hao,LI Hongming,LI Wenjia,ZHOU Jinyu,LAI Juan

DOI: 10.19597/j.issn.1000-3754.202001012

参考文献(References)：

• [1]贾承造，郑民，张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发，2012,39(2):129-136.JIA Chengzao,ZHENG Min,ZHANG Yongfeng.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(2):129-136.
• [2]邱振，邹才能，李建忠，等.非常规油气资源评价进展与未来展望[J].天然气地球科学，2013,24(2):238-246.QIU Zhen,ZOU Caineng,LI Jianzhong,et al.Unconventional petroleum resources assessment:Progress and future prospects[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(2):238-246.
• [3]聂海宽，张柏桥，刘光祥，等.四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气高产地质原因及启示：以涪陵页岩气田JY6-2HF为例[J].石油与天然气地质，2020,41(3):463-473.NIE Haikuan,ZHANG Baiqiao,LIU Guangxiang,et al.Geological factors contributing to high shale gas yield in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Fms of Sichuan Basin:A case study of Well JY6-2HF in Fuling shale gas field[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2020,41(3):463-473.
• [4]钟城，秦启荣，胡东风，等.川东南丁山地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏“六性”特征[J].油气地质与采收率，2019,26(2):14-23.ZHONG Cheng,QIN Qirong,HU Dongfeng,et al.Experimental study on “six properties” of shale gas reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Dingshan area,southeastern Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(2):14-23.
• [5]高博乐，潘仁芳，金吉能，等.富有机质页岩微裂缝地震响应特征：以长宁示范区宁201井为例[J].石油与天然气地质，2020,41(2):407-415.GAO Bole,PAN Renfang,JIN Jineng,et al.Characteristic analysis of seismic response of micro-fractures in organic-rich shale:A case study of Well Ning201 in the Changning demonstration zone[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2020,41(2):407-415.
• [6]李霞，周灿灿，李潮流，等.页岩气岩石物理分析技术及研究进展[J].测井技术，2013,37(4):352-359.LI Xia,ZHOU Cancan,LI Chaoliu,et al.Advances in petrophysical analysis technology of shale gas[J].Well Logging Technology,2013,37(4):352-359.
• [7]印兴耀，张繁昌，孙成禹.叠前地震反演[M].东营：中国石油大学出版社，2010.YIN Xingyao,ZHANG Fanchang,SUN Chengyu.Prestack seismic inversion[M].Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2010.
• [8]陈胜，赵文智，欧阳永林，等.利用地球物理综合预测方法识别页岩气储层甜点：以四川盆地长宁区块下志留统龙马溪组为例[J].天然气工业，2017,37(5):20-30.CHEN Sheng,ZHAO Wenzhi,OUYANG Yonglin,et al.Comprehensive prediction of shale gas sweet spots based on geophysical properties:A case study of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Fm in Changning block,Sichuan Basin [J].Natural Gas Industry,2017,37(5):20-30.
• [9]曾庆才，陈胜，贺佩，等.四川盆地威远龙马溪组页岩气甜点区地震定量预测[J].石油勘探与开发，2018,45(3):406-414.ZENG Qingcai,CHEN Sheng,HE Pei,et al.Quantitative seismic prediction of shale gas sweet spots in Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation,Weiyuan area,Sichuan Basin,SW China[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2018,45(3):406-414.
• [10]李金磊，尹正武.四川盆地焦石坝地区页岩气储层地震定量预测方法[J].石油物探，2015,54(3):324-330.LI Jinlei,YIN Zhengwu.Seismic quantitative prediction method of shale gas reservoirs in the Jiaoshiba area,Sichuan Basin[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2015,54(3):324-330.
• [11]高秋菊，谭明友，张营革，等.陆相页岩油“甜点”井震联合定量评价技术：以济阳坳陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段为例[J].油气地质与采收率，2019,26(1):165-173.GAO Qiuju,TAN Mingyou,ZHANG Yingge,et al.Well-seismic joint technology for quantitative evaluation of“sweet spot”in continental shale oil:A case study of Lower Es3 Member of Luojia area in Jiyang Depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2019,26(1):165-173.
• [12]苏建龙，屈大鹏，陈超，等.叠前地震反演方法对比分析：焦石坝页岩气藏勘探实例[J].石油地球物理勘探，2016,51(3):581-588.SU Jianlong,QU Dapeng,CHEN Chao,et al.Application of pre-stack inversion technique for shale gas in Jiaoshiba gas field[J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2016,51(3):581-588.
• [13]张津海，张远银，孙赞东.道集品质对叠前AVO/AVA同时反演的影响[J].石油地球物理勘探，2012,47(1):68-73.ZHANG Jinhai,ZHANG Yuanyin,SUN Zandong.The effects of seismic data conditioning on pre-stack AVO/AVA simultaneous inversion [J].Oil Geophysical Prospecting,2012,47(1):68-73.