大庆石油地质与开发

2002, (02) 19-20+75

[打印本页] [关闭]
本期目录(Current Issue) | 过刊浏览(Archive) | 高级检索(Advanced Search)

低渗透油藏压裂井网的水驱采收率与井网密度关系探讨
A Discussion on the Relation between Waterflooding Recovery and Well Spacing of Fracturing Well Pattern of Low Permeable Reservoir

姜瑞忠,侯建锋
JIANG Rui zhong 1; HOU Jian feng 2(1.Department Of Petroleum Engineering;

摘要(Abstract):

以长庆安塞油田和吉林两井油田的实际资料为依据 ,利用谢尔卡乔夫公式、前苏联经验公式以及国内经验公式 ,对低渗透油藏压裂井网的水驱采收率与井网密度关系进行了探讨。结果表明 ,对于常规方式注水开发井网 ,在利用经验公式计算不同井网密度下水驱采收率时 ,前苏联经验公式计算结果明显偏大 ,而谢氏公式偏小 ,国内经验公式相对比较可靠 ;对于压裂注采井网 ,特别是对实施大规模压裂的低渗透油藏注采井网 ,利用已有经验公式计算水驱采收率或进行经济评价时有一定偏差。因此 ,有必要建立低渗透油藏压裂注采井网的水驱采收率与井网密度的经验公式
On the basis of the true data of Ansai Oilfield in Chang qing and Liangjing Oilfield in Jilin, using XIE formula,former Soviet empirical formula and domestic empirical formula, a discussion on the relation between waterflooding recovery and well spacing of fracturing well pattern of low permeable reservoir is made. As the result indicates, for conventional water injection developing well spacing, if use empirical formula to calculate waterflooding recovery in different well spacing, the calculating result of former Soviet empirical formula is on the high side obviously, while that of XIE formula is on the low side, and the domestic empirical formula is relative reliable. For fracturing injection production pattern, especially for those of low permeable reservoir having been fractured in a large scale, using known empirical formula to calculate water flooding recovery or make economic evaluations has some error. Therefore, it is essential to establish an empirical formula for fracturing injection production pattern and well spacing of low permeable reservoir.

关键词(KeyWords): 低渗透油藏;压裂井网;水驱采收率;井网密度
low permeable reservoir; fracturing pattern; water flooding recovery; well spacing

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Authors): 姜瑞忠,侯建锋
JIANG Rui zhong 1; HOU Jian feng 2(1.Department Of Petroleum Engineering;

扩展功能
本文信息
服务与反馈
本文关键词相关文章
本文作者相关文章
中国知网
分享