动用孔隙界限实验及致密油开发方式EXPERIMENT OF THE RECOVERABLE PORE LIMITS AND TIGHT OIL DEVELOPING METHODS
潘伟义,张诗洋,伦增珉,吕成远,郎东江,赵清民
PAN Weiyi,ZHANG Shiyang,LUN Zengmin,L Chengyuan,LANG Dongjiang,ZHAO Qingmin
摘要(Abstract):
致密油一次采收率低,注水与注气开发是常用的提高采收率方法,但注入性与动用程度尚不明确,因此评价开发方式与动用孔隙界限之间的关系对致密油提高采收率方法的实施尤为重要。采用核磁共振测试与驱替实验相结合的方法,真实展现不同注入介质和注入条件下注入介质与原油的真实驱替过程,明确了不同开发方式与动用孔隙界限的关系。研究表明:水驱和CO_2驱随着驱替压差逐渐增大,动用孔隙界限初期下降比较快,逐渐趋于稳定;水驱和CO_2驱动用孔隙界限与岩心渗透率均呈线性关系;致密油储层CO_2驱动用孔隙界限明显低于水驱动用孔隙界限。
The primary recovery of the tight oil is rather lower,the water and gas injections are the commonly adopted EOR methods,but their injectivities and produced degrees are not obvious,therefore it is very important for the influence of the relationships between the developing method evaluation and recoverable pore limits on the above two stimulations. With the help of the combination of nuclear magnetic resonance( NMR) and core flooding tests,the true flooding processes of the media and crude oil were displayed in the cases of different injecting media and conditions,thus the relationships between the different developing methods and recoverable pore limits were made clear. The studies show that for the water and CO_2 floodings,with the gradual rise of the pressure differences,the developed pore limits drop rather faster in the beginning,and then tend to stabilize; there exit linear correlations between the limits and core permeability; the developed limits of CO_2 flooded tight oil reservoirs are obviously lower than those of the waterflooded ones.
关键词(KeyWords):
动用孔隙界限;致密油;核磁共振测试;水驱;CO2驱
recoverable/developed pore limit;tight oil;nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR);waterflooding;CO2 flooding
基金项目(Foundation): 国家科技重大专项“低丰度致密低渗油气藏开发关键技术”(2016ZX05048);; 国家自然科学基金项目“核磁共振技术研究裂缝性致密油藏注二氧化碳提高采收率机理”(51504283)
作者(Author):
潘伟义,张诗洋,伦增珉,吕成远,郎东江,赵清民
PAN Weiyi,ZHANG Shiyang,LUN Zengmin,L Chengyuan,LANG Dongjiang,ZHAO Qingmin
参考文献(References):
- [1]Hart Energy Research Group.Global shale oil study[R].Zhu Weilin,Wang Zhixin,Gong Shaobo,et al.The Petroliferous Hart Energy,2014
- [2]尤源,刘建平,冯胜斌,等.块状致密砂岩的非均质性及对致密油勘探开发的启示[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2015,34(4):168-174
- [3]汪少勇,王社教,李登华,等.致密油地质风险分析方法与流程初探[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(3):1-7
- [4]王磊,李克文,赵楠,等.致密油储层孔隙度测定方法[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(4):49-53
- [5]时保宏,张艳,张雷,等.鄂尔多斯盆地长7油积岩特征及成藏条件分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2014,32(1):45-49
- [6]林铁锋,张庆石,张金友,等.齐家地区高台子油层致密砂岩油藏特征及勘探潜力[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2014,33(5):36-43
- [7]Pollastro R M,Roberts L N R,Cook T A,et a1.Assessment of undiscovered technically recoverable oil and gas resources of the Bakken Formation,Williston Basin,Montana and North Dakota[R].Open-File Report,2008
- [8]贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-349
- [9]杨华,李士祥,刘显阳.鄂尔多斯盆地致密油、页岩油特征及资源潜力[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):1-11
- [10]Ghaderi S M,Clarkson C R,Kaviani D.Investigation of primary recovery in tight oil formations:A look at the Cardium Formation,Alberta[R].SPE 148995,2011.
- [11]Zuwa S,Omoregle,Factors Affecting the Equivalency of Different Capillary Pressure Measurement Techniques[R].SPE 15384,1988.
- [12]Wang H,Liao X,Zhao X,et al.The Study of CO2Flooding of Horizontal Well with SRV in Tight Oil Reservoir[R].SPE169967,2014.
- [13]Lowden B D,Porter M J,Powrie L S.T2Relaxation Time Versus Mercury Injection Capillary Pressure:Implications for NMR Logging and Reservoir Characterisation[R].SPE 50607,1998
- [14]Matteson A,Tomanic J P,Herron M M,et al.NMR Relaxation of Clay-Brine Mixtures[R].SPE 49008,2000.
- [15]李海波,朱巨义,郭和坤.核磁共振T2谱换算孔隙半径分布方法研究[J].波谱学杂志,2008,25(2):273-279.
- [16]李召成,孙建孟,耿生臣,等.应用核磁共振测井T2谱划分裂缝型储层[J].石油物探,2001,40(4):113-118
- 动用孔隙界限
- 致密油
- 核磁共振测试
- 水驱
- CO2驱
recoverable/developed pore limit - tight oil
- nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)
- waterflooding
- CO2 flooding