杨勉,陈艳丽,付广
YANG Mian,CHEN Yanli,FU Guang

• 1:东北石油大学地球科学学院

摘要(Abstract)：

根据已有探井的岩性组合、测井曲线变化规律,并结合盆地发育演化过程,发现贝尔凹陷下白垩统可识别出3套区域性盖层和10套局部性盖层。研究认为贝尔凹陷的区域性盖层分布广、厚度大,局部性盖层分布小、厚度薄;各套盖层的封闭性好坏主要受盖层的厚度、展布连续性、排替压力、成岩程度及断裂对盖层的破坏程度等因素控制。选取沉积旋回、成岩演化阶段、盖层单层及累计厚度,断裂破坏程度、泥地比和排替压力等作为评价指标,对凹陷内的各套盖层的封闭性进行了综合评价。结果表明:整体上贝西次凹和贝中次凹的盖层封盖能力相对较好,贝中断隆带中、南部盖层封盖能力相对最差;层序Sqd_1~1、Sqd_1~2、Sqd_1~2内的3套区域性盖层和层序Sqn_1、Sqn_2内的局部性盖层封盖能力以中等、好级别为主,层序Sqtb、Sqd_2内的局部性盖层封盖能力以中等、差级别为主。
According to the lithologic combination of the existed exploration wells,the changed laws of the well loggings,and moreover the integration of the basin development-evolution process,3 sets of regional cap rocks and10 sets of local cap rocks are discovered and recognized in Lower Cretaceous Beier Sag.The studies show that the regional cap rocks are characterized by wide distribution,big thickness,whereas the local cap rocks are small and thin.The sealing abilities of each set of cap rock are mainly determined by the thickness,continuity,expulsion pressure and diagenesis degree of the cap rocks distribution and moreover the damaged degree of the rocks by the faults etc.By means of choosing the following evaluating indexes such as sedimentary cycle,diagenesis evolution stage,monolayer thickness and cumulative thickness,damaged degree by the faults,mud-strata ratio,expulsion pressure and so on,the sealing abilities of each set of cap rocks in the sag are comprehensively evaluated.The results show that the abilities of the cap rocks in Beixi Subsag and Beizhong Subsag are relatively better in a whole,on the contrary,the abilities in the middle and southern parts of Beizhong Fault-uplift Belt are comparatively theworst;the middle-good sealing degrees are mainly presented for the three sets of regional cap rocks in Sqd_1~1,Sqd_1~2and Sqd_2 and moreover the local cap rocks in Sqn_1 and Sqn_2;the middle-bad degrees are shown for the the local cap rocks in Sqtb and Sqd_2.

关键词(KeyWords)： 海拉尔盆地;贝尔凹陷;盖层发育特征;封闭性;评价
Hailar Basin;Beier Sag;cap-rock development characteristic;sealing ability;evaluation

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家大型油气田及煤层气开发科技重大专项“中国大型气田形成条件、成藏机制与富集规律研究”(2011ZX05007-002)

作者(Author): 杨勉,陈艳丽,付广
YANG Mian,CHEN Yanli,FU Guang

参考文献(References)：

• [1]付晓飞,董晶,吕延防,等.海拉尔盆地乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷断裂构造特征及控藏机理[J].地质学报,2012,86(6):877-889.
• [2]张宁.贝尔凹陷基岩潜山油成藏主控因素及模式[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2011,30(6):23-26.
• [3]李明刚,庞雄奇,马中振,等.乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷油气成藏主控因素分析[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(5):1-4.
• [4]张云峰,冯亚琴,徐涵.贝尔凹陷贝中次凹南屯组一段储层特征研究[J].地质科学,2011,46(2):510-517.
• [5]陈晓,李红英,刘赫,等.海拉尔盆地贝中次凹油藏特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(6):39-43.
• [6]张海军.海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷油气分布规律及主控因素研究[J].中国石油勘探,2012,(2):8-11.
• [7]陈淑莉.贝尔凹陷盖层分布与破坏对油聚集与分布的控制作用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2012,31(1):6-12.
• [8]黄劲松,刘长国,牟广山.贝尔凹陷大一段下部旋回泥岩盖层封闭能力综合评价[J].大庆石油学院学报,2009,33(6):19-24.
• [9]李建民,王树海.贝尔凹陷布达特群潜山盖层封闭能力综合评价[J].大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(3):8-10.
• [10]尹太举,张昌民.层序地层格架内的油气勘探[J].天然气地球科学,2005,16(1):25-26.
• [11]Van Wagoner J C,Posamentier H W,Mitchum RM,et al.An overview of the fundamentals of sequence stratigraphy and key definitions[J].AAPG SEPM(Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication),1988,(42):125-154.
• [12]李群,王英民,宋国奇.层序地层学在陆相斜坡带隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2002,21(3):12-13.
• [13]肖乾华,李宏伟,李云松.层序地层学原理与方法在隐蔽油气藏勘探中的应用[J].断块油气田,1998,5(2):6-12.
• [14]鹿洪友,操应长,吴明荣,等.层序地层学应用于陆相湖盆中隐蔽油气藏的成因解释[J].大地构造与成矿学,2004,28(2):209-211.
• [15]沈守文,彭大钧,颜其彬,等.层序地层学预测隐蔽油气藏的原理和方法[J].地球学报,2000,21(3):300-305.
• [16]冯冲,黄志龙,童传新,等.莺歌海盆地莺歌海组二段泥岩盖层封闭性综合评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2011,33(4):373-377.
• [17]吕延防,万军,沙子暄.被断裂破坏的盖层封闭能力评价方法及其应用[J].地质科学,2008,43(1):162-174.
• [18]张立国,付广,赵颖颖.被断裂破坏后盖层封闭能力的评价方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(4):15-18.