王贤君,刘向斌,孟建勋,李庆松,孙国辉,韩重莲
WANG Xianjun,LIU Xiangbin,MENG Jianxun,LI Qingsong,SUN Guohui,HAN Zhonglian

• 1:大庆油田有限责任公司采油工程研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

注采参数是影响复合热载体吞吐采油现场试验效果关键因素之一。为了提高复合热载体吞吐采油的经济效益,依据复合热载体为两相三组分的流体特征,结合试验区油藏特点,以萨北过渡带的典型井B2-2-S90井为模拟井,利用数值模拟方法对复合热载体吞吐的注采参数进行了优化。结果表明:优化的措施半径为16 m,注入速度为9000 m~3/d,注入温度为310℃,焖井时间为9 d,采液速度为39 m~3/d。同时依据优化的注采参数开展了现场试验,试验取得了明显的增油效果,累计增油量739.7 t,有效期14个月。
The parameters of the injection and production are one of the key factors of influencing the effects of the oil-production field test by means of combined heat carrier huff and puff.In order to enhance the economic profit of the huff and puff,with the help of the liquid characteristics of two phases and three components of the carrier,the optimization of the parameters is conducted by integrating with the reservoir properties of the tested area and taking the typical Well B2-2-S90 in Sabei transitional belt as a simulating example and moreover by means of the numerical simulating method.The results show that the optimized treatment radius is 16 m,the injection rate is 9000 m~3/d,the injection temperature is 310 ℃,the well killing duration is 9 d,the liquid withdrawl rate is 39 m~3/d.At the same time,according to the optimized parameters,the field test is launched,and moreover the oil ineremental effect is obvious,the accumulated incremental production is up to 739.7 t,the valid duration reaches 14 months.

关键词(KeyWords)： 复合热载体;吞吐;注采参数优化;现场试验
combined heat carrier;huff and puff;injection-production parameter optimization;field test

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家科技重大专项“松辽盆地喇萨杏高含水示范工程”(2008ZX05000-042)资助

作者(Author): 王贤君,刘向斌,孟建勋,李庆松,孙国辉,韩重莲
WANG Xianjun,LIU Xiangbin,MENG Jianxun,LI Qingsong,SUN Guohui,HAN Zhonglian

参考文献(References)：

• [1]翁小红,马哲斌.HYS油田复合热载体驱油先导试验[J].石油钻探技术,2012,40(4):111-114.
• [2]姜杰.海上稠油多元热流体吞吐开采技术研究[J].油气藏评价与开发,2012,2(4):38-40.
• [3]张伟,孙永涛.海上铜油多元热流体吞吐增产机理室内实验研究[J].石油化工应用,2013,32(1):34-36.
• [4]冯祥,李敬松.稠油油藏多元热流体吞吐影响因素分析[J].科学技术与工程,2013.13(2):468-471.
• [5]杨兵,李敬松.海上稠油油藏多元热流体吞吐开采技术优化研究[J].石油地质与工程,2012,26(1):54-56.
• [6]廖长霖,廖新维,赵晓亮.低渗透非均质性油藏扩大波及体积技术⑴大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(3):118-122..
• [7]王克亮,明阳阳,张垒垒.CO2气驱过程中泡沫扩大波及体积效果[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(5):128-131.
• [8]李延军.海拉尔油田注空气和CO2驱试验效果及应用潜力[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(5):132-136.
• [9]魏浩光,马坤,岳湘安.特低渗透油藏水驱后氮气驱油实验[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(2):118-121.
• [10]张江,郭庆军,肖鲁川.古708区块地层原油烟道气驱细管实验[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2013,32(1):125-127.
• [11]刘尚奇,王伯军,孔凡忠.低渗透油藏注空气提高采收率物理模拟实验[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2011,30(6):143-145.
• [12]张江,张小雷,肖鲁川.低渗透油藏烟道气驱流体相态评价[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(5):143-145.
• [13]杨浩,肖平,胡春礼.气驱窜流特性理论研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(4):156-159.
• [14]范照伟,杨胜来.火山岩气藏高含CO2天然气气水两相渗流特征[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2009,28(4):151-155.
• [15]杨宝泉,任韶然,王杰祥,等.基于模糊湖的轻质油藏注空气筛选评价方法[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2010,29(1):119-123.
• [16]刘永良,贾永禄.考虑热损失的稠油热采三区复合油藏试井模型[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(1):78-82.
• [17]王家震.喇嘛甸油田聚驱后蒸汽驱提高采收率研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2008,27(5):114-116.
• [18]陈杰,钱昱.葡南葡浅12区块蒸汽驱矿场试验研究[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(5):68-71.
• [19]蒋有伟,沈德煌.扶余油田自生高岭石对注蒸汽的影响[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(1):60-62.
• [20]范世通.欢喜岭油田齐40块蒸汽驱开发蒸汽腔发育规律研究[J].特种油气藏,2013,20(1):92-94.