李克智
LI Kezhi

• 1:中国石化华北油气分公司

摘要(Abstract)：

大牛地山西组致密砂岩储层非均质性较强，凭借岩心、测井、录井资料等常规预测手段识别压裂“甜点”效果不理想。为了精确水平井压裂选段，提高压裂改造效果，在明确影响压裂甜点的地质、工程参数基础上建立测井解释模型，而后优选熵值分析法明确了各参数对压裂效果的影响程度，最后利用综合权重法建立压裂“甜点”计算模型。结果表明：校准后的储层参数测井解释模型预测精度提高了37.2%～46.3%；孔隙度、渗透率、弹性模量、泊松比4项参数是影响大牛地气井压裂效果的关键因素，参数累计权重所占比例高达53.32%；依据单井压裂“甜点”识别结果，明确了最佳压裂“甜点”位置与非压裂“甜点”位置，经过产气剖面数据验证，压裂甜度与单段产气量具有良好的正相关关系。矿场13口井压裂数据表明，应用此压裂“甜点”预测方法得到的甜度与压裂后产能的相关度达85.2%，此方法可为提高致密砂岩气藏水平井压裂效果提供技术支撑。
High heterogeneity of the tight sandstone reservoirs of Daniudi Shanxi Formation leads to uneffective identification of sweet spots by means of conventional prediction methods using cores,geophysical logging and mud logging data. In order to accurately select fracturing intervals of horizontal wells and improve stimulation effect,logging interpretation model is established firstly through clarifying geological and engineering parameters affecting fracturing sweet spots. Then entropy analysis method is optimized to clarify the influence degree of each parameter on fracturing effect. Finally,fracturing“sweet spot”calculation model is established by comprehensive weight method. The results show that prediction accuracy of calibrated logging interpretation model of reservoir parameters increases by 37.2%～46.3%. Porosity,permeability,Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio are the key factors affecting fracturing effect of Daniudi gas well,with cumulative weight accounting for 53.32%. Based on the identification results of single well fracturing“sweet spots”, the optimal fracturing“sweet spots”position and non-fracturing“sweet spots”position are determined, and gas production profile data verifies good positive correlation between fracturing sweetness and single-interval gas production. In addition,evaluation and analysis of fracturing“sweet spots”of 13 field wells show that the correlation between sweetness value and post-fracturing productivity reaches 85.2%. This method provides technical support for improving the fracturing effect of tight sandstone gas reservoir horizontal wells.

关键词(KeyWords)： 大牛地气田;压裂选段;测井解释模型;权重分析法;压裂“甜点”
Daniudi Gas Field;fracturing interval selection;logging interpretation model;weight analysis;fracturing “sweet spot”

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 中国石化科技部科技项目“大牛地山西组未动用储量区高效压裂关键技术”（P19019-7）

作者(Author): 李克智
LI Kezhi

DOI: 10.19597/j.issn.1000-3754.202110035

参考文献(References)：

• [1]郑婷.大牛地气田山2段致密砂岩气层评价[D].成都：成都理工大学，2015.ZHENG Ting.Gas reservoir evaluation of tight sandstone in Shan-2Member of Daniudi Gas Field[D].Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology,2015.
• [2]刘长印.焦石坝地区页岩气水平井压裂快速选段方法[J].油气井测试，2019,28(6):9-13.LIU Changyin. Rapid fracturing layer selecting method for horizontal shale gas wells in Jiaoshiba area[J].Well Testing, 2019,28(6):9-13.
• [3]廖东良，路保平，陈延军.页岩气地质甜点评价方法：以四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田为例[J].石油学报，2019,40(2):144-151.LIAO Dongliang, LU Baoping, CHEN Yanjun. An evaluation method of geological sweet spots of shale gas reservoir:A case study of Jiaoshiba gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2019,40(2):144-151.
• [4]廖东良，路保平.页岩气工程甜点评价方法：以四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田为例[J].天然气工业，2018,38(2):43-50.LIAO Dongliang,LU Baoping.An evaluation method of engineering sweet spots of shale gas reservoir development:A case study from the Jiaoshiba gas field,Sichuan Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2018,38(2):43-50.
• [5]李旻翾，孙敬，胡佳妮，等.页岩气水平井段甜点优选模型[J].科学技术与工程，2020,20(24):9844-9850.LI Minxuan, SUN Jing, HU Jiani, et al. Sweet spot selection model for horizontal shale gas well section[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2020,20(24):9844-9850.
• [6]黄天镜，刘钰洋，吴英强，等.基于层次分析法的致密砂岩双甜点评价方法[J].科学技术与工程，2021, 21(5):1775-1782.HUANG Tianjing,LIU Yuyang,WU Yingqiang,et al.Evaluation method of comprehensive sweet spots in tight sandstone reservoir based on analytical hierarchy process[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(5):1775-1782.
• [7]王瑞.致密油藏水平井体积压裂效果影响因素分析[J].特种油气藏，2015,22(2):126-128,157.WANG Rui. Analysis on influential factors for volumetric fracturing effects in horizontal well in tight reservoir[J].Special Oil&Gas Reservoirs,2015,22(2):126-128,157.
• [8]战永平，付春丽，段晓飞，等.基于BP网络分析大牛地气田山西组气井压裂效果影响因素[J].长江大学学报（自科版），2017,14(19):85-89,120.ZHAN Yongping, FU Chunli, DUAN Xiaofei, et al. Research on influencing factors of fracturing effect of gas wells in Shanxi Formation of Daniudi gas field based on BP network[J].Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2017, 14(19):85-89,120.
• [9]侯瑞云，刘忠群.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田致密低渗储层评价与开发对策[J].石油与天然气地质，2012, 33(1):118-128.HOU Ruiyun,LIU Zhongqun. Reservoir evaluation and development strategies of Daniudi tight sand gas field in the Ordos Basin[J]. Oil&Gas Geology,2012,33(1):118-128.
• [10]邢景宝.大牛地低压致密气藏储层改造理论与实践[M].北京：中国石化出版社，2009.XING Jingbao. Theory and practice of reservoir reconstruction in Daniudi low pressure tight gas reservoir[M]. Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,2009.
• [11]张广权，陈舒薇，郭书元.鄂尔多斯地区东北部大牛地气田山西组沉积相[J].石油与天然气地质，2011,32(3):388-396,403.ZHANG Guangquan,CHEN Shuwei,GUO Shuyuan.Sedimentary facies of the Shanxi Formation in Daniudi gas field,northeastern Ordos area[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2011,32(3):388-396,403.
• [12]廖东良.页岩气层“双甜点”评价方法及工程应用展望[J].石油钻探技术，2020,48(4):94-99.LIAO Dongliang.Evaluation methods and engineering application of the feasibility of“double sweet spots”in shale gas reservoirs[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques,2020,48(4):94-99.
• [13]崔宝文，陈春瑞，林旭东，等.松辽盆地古龙页岩油甜点特征及分布[J].大庆石油地质与开发，2020,39(3):45-55.CUI Baowen,CHEN Chunrui,LIN Xudong,et al.Characteristics and distribution of sweet spots in Gulong shale oil reservoirs of Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,2020,39(3):45-55.
• [14]林旺，范洪富，刘立峰，等.工程参数对致密油藏压裂水平井产能的影响[J].油气地质与采收率，2017, 24(6):120-126.LIN Wang,FAN Hongfu,LIU Lifeng,et al.Effect of engineering parameters on fractured horizontal well productivity in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2017,24(6):120-126.
• [15]谢润成，周文，李良.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地上古生界气藏压裂效果分析[J].天然气工业，2004,24(12):71-73,190.XIE Runcheng, ZHOU Wen, LI Liang. Postfracture response analysis of upper Paleozoic gas reservoirs in Daniudi field in E’Erduosi Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2004,24(12):71-73,190.
• [16]邓宇，陈胜，欧阳永林，等.川西南威远地区页岩气效益“甜点区”地震综合预测方法及其应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发，2019,38(2):112-122.DENG Yu, CHEN Sheng, OUYANG Yonglin, et al. Seismic comprehensive predicting method and its application of the shale gas effect “sweet spot region”in Weiyuan area of Southwest Sichuan[J].Petroleum Geology&Oilfield Development in Daqing,2019,38(2):112-122.
• [17]雍世和，张超谟.测井数据处理与综合解释[M].东营：中国石油大学出版社，2007.YONG Shihe,ZHANG Chaomo.Logging data processing and comprehensive interpretation[M]. Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press,2007.
• [18]邓雪，李家铭，曾浩健，等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识，2012, 42(7):93-100.DENG Xue, LI Jiaming, ZENG Haojian, et al. Research on computation methods of AHP weight vector and its applications[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(7):93-100.
• [19]王富喜，毛爱华，李赫龙，等.基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J].地理科学，2013,33(11):1323-1329.WANG Fuxi, MAO Aihua, LI Helong, et al.Quality measurement and regional difference of urbanization in Shandong Province based on entropy method[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2013,33(11):1323-1329.
• [20]顾俊发，许明阳，马方圆，等.基于MIC的支持向量回归及其在化工过程中的应用[J].化工学报，2021,72(3):1480-1486.GU Junfa, XU Mingyang, MA Fangyuan, et al.Support vector regression based on maximal information coefficient and its application in chemical industrial processes[J].Journal of Chemical Engineering,2021,72(3):1480-1486.
• [21]尚世龙，高加印.模糊灰色关联法在大牛地气田优选压裂井层中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识，2016, 46(13):103-108.SHANG Shilong, GAO Jiayin. A fuzzy grey correlation analysis method for selecting fractured wells and layer in Daniudi Gas Field[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2016, 46(13):103-108.