明瑞卿,贺会群,胡强法
MING Ruiqing,HE Huiqun,HU Qiangfa

• 1:中国石油勘探开发研究院
• 2:中国石油集团工程技术研究院有限公司

摘要(Abstract)：

针对水平气井连续携液机理不清、临界携液流量计算误差较大等问题,基于水平气井连续携液的实验结果,首先对水平井筒中的液膜和中心气流进行受力分析,综合考虑液膜稳定存在和连续携液这两方面,建立了水平气井的临界携液流量预测新模型,并给出相应的修正因子。敏感性分析表明:在水平气井中,修正因子主要由油管内径、液相黏度和举升因子决定;随着油管内径与液相黏度的不断增大,临界携液流量也相应增大;而随着举升因子的增大,临界携液流量随之减小。实例研究表明:新模型的计算结果相对误差小于10%,比常用计算模型提高精度10. 5%~62. 8%;计算结果与现场实际数据吻合度更高,可用来准确预测水平气井的临界携液流量。新模型对提高水平气井的最终采收率具有指导作用。
In the light of the problems of the unclear mechanism of continuous liquid loading,rather bigger calculated error of the critical liquid-loading flow rate and so on for the horizontal gas wells,on the basis of the experimental results of the continuous liquid load-up for the wells,the force was first analyzed for the liquid film and central gas flow in the horizontal wellbore,considering the two aspects of the stable existence of the film and continuous liquid load-up,the new predicting model of the critical liquid-loading flow rate was established for the horizontal gas wells,at the same time,the corresponding correcting factors were presented. The sensitivity analysis shows that in the gas wells,the correcting factors are mainly determined by the inner diameter of the oil tubing,the viscosity of the liquid phase and the lifting factor; with the rises of the inner diameter and the viscosity,the critical liquidloading flow rate is correspondingly increased; while with the rise of the lifting factor,the rate stated above is decreased. The history case study proves that the relative error of the calculated results by the new model is less than10%,comparing with the common calculating model,the precision can be enhanced by 10. 5%-62. 8%; there is pretty higher matched degree between the calculated results and the field actual data,so the critical liquid-loading flow rate can be correctly predicted. The new model possesses a certain guiding action for enhancing the ultimate recovery of the horizontal gas wells in the field.

关键词(KeyWords)： 水平气井;临界携液流量;液膜模型;修正因子;油管内径;液相黏度;举升因子;提高采收率
horizontal gas well;critical liquid-carrying/loading flow rate;liquid-film model;correcting factor;oil tubing inner-diameter;liquid viscosity;lift factor;enhancing recovery factor

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家科技重大专项“深层连续管作业技术与装备”(2016ZX05023-006);; 中国石油集团工程技术研究院有限公司科研项目“连续管作业综合软件开发”(2015F-2001-01)联合资助

作者(Author): 明瑞卿,贺会群,胡强法
MING Ruiqing,HE Huiqun,HU Qiangfa

DOI: 10.19597/j.issn.1000-3754.201711015

参考文献(References)：

• [1]明瑞卿,贺会群,胡强法.基于紊流条件下的气井临界携液流量计算模型[J].地质科技情报,2018,37(3):248-252.
• [2]周朝,吴晓东,刘雄伟,等.深层凝析气井临界携液模型优化研究[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(6):97-100.
• [3]周朝,吴晓东,汤敬飞,等.井下涡流排液采气井筒临界携液量计算[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(6):99-103.
• [4]明瑞卿,贺会群,胡强法.考虑水平段长度与储层倾角的边水气藏见水时间预测新模型[J].科学技术与工程,2018,18(5):45-49.
• [5]陈小刚.低压低产积液气井复产新工艺[J].特种油气藏,2017,24(3):160-163.
• [6]高涛,王高文,石硕坤.徐深气田D区块气井积液诊断及水体规模[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2017,36(6):86-90.
• [7]陈德春,姚亚,韩昊,等.定向气井临界携液流量预测新模型[J].天然气工业,2016,36(6):40-44.
• [8]高升.定向气井携液临界流量实验及应用[D].成都:西南石油大学,2012.
• [9]王琦,李颖川,王志彬,等.水平气井连续携液实验研究及模型评价[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(3):139-145.
• [10]王琦.水平井井筒气液两相流动模拟实验研究[D].成都:西南石油大学,2014.
• [11]赵哲军,刘通,许剑,等.气井稳定携液之我见[J].天然气工业,2015,35(6):59-63.
• [12]肖高棉,李颖川,喻欣.气藏水平井连续携液理论与实验[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(3):122-126.
• [13]Kurose R,Misumi R,Komori R. Drag and lift forces acting on a spherical bubble in a linear shear flow[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow,2001,27(7):1247-1258.
• [14]Clark R K,Bickham K L. A mechanistic model for cuttings transport[R]. SPE 28306,1994.
• [15]陈家琅,陈涛平.石油气液两相管流[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2010.