赵海峰,石俊,任鹏,车航,刘国华
ZHAO Haifeng,SHI Jun,REN Peng,CHE Hang,LIU Guohua

• 1:中国石油大学(北京)石油工程学院
• 2:中国石油华北油田采油工程研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

水力压裂的地破试验是测量深部原位地应力的有效方法,从完整地破试验曲线可以解释出地应力,但现场地破试验大多得到非完整地破试验曲线,无法从中解释出地应力。利用弹性力学方法,提出了裂缝扩展压力与两个水平主应力的关系,结合裂缝起裂压力与两个水平主应力的关系进行地应力解释。琼002井4 340 m处地应力解释结果表明:由非完整压裂曲线解释地应力方法与传统解释方法得到的最大地应力相差0.53%,最小地应力相差0.15%。由非完整压裂曲线解释地应力的方法具有可靠性与准确性。
Ground-breaking test based on the hydraulic fracturing is an effective method for measuring the earth/in-situ stresses in the deep formations,and the stress can be interpreted by means of the complete breaking test curve.Unfortunately,most curves got from the fields are not complete,so the stress can not be interpreted.With the help of elastic mechanics,the relationship between the fracture propagation pressure and two horizontal principal stresses is proposed;the stress is interpreted by means of the relation between the fracture initiation pressure and two horizontal principal stresses.The interpreted results of the in-situ stresses in 4 340 m deep formation of Well Joan 002 show that the maximal stress difference is 0.53%between this new method by the field incomplete curve and the traditional interpreting one,and the corresponding minimal stress difference is decreased to 0.15%.The interpreting method by the incomplete fractured curve is characterized by the reliability and accuracy.

关键词(KeyWords)： 岩石力学;水力压裂;地应力;裂缝扩展压力;裂缝起裂压力
rock mechanics;hydraulic fracturing/frac;earth/terrestrial/in-situ stress;fracture propagation pressure;fracture initiation pressure

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50304010,90510005);; 中石油创新基金项目(05E7015)的部分研究成果

作者(Author): 赵海峰,石俊,任鹏,车航,刘国华
ZHAO Haifeng,SHI Jun,REN Peng,CHE Hang,LIU Guohua

参考文献(References)：

• [1]石林,金衍,陈勉,等.山前构造地层地应力测试方法及其直井井壁稳定分析模型[J].江汉石油学院学报,2004,26(3):2355-2358.
• [2]葛洪魁,林英松,王顺昌.水力压裂地应力测量有关技术问题的讨论[J].石油钻采工艺,1998,20(6):53-56.
• [3]Rutqvist J,Chin-Fu Tsang,Stephansson 0.Uncertainty in maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the the presence of the induced fracture[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2000,37(1-2):107-120.
• [4]裴福顺.海拉尔盆地凝灰质储层地应力确定及应用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2011,30(4):84-88.
• [5]Ito T,Evans K,Kawai K,et al.Hydraulic fracture reopening pressure and the estimation of maximum horizontal stress[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,1999,36(6):811-826.
• [6]杨涛,肖立国.榆树林油田优化压裂研究与实践[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2003,22(3):72-74.
• [7]刘建中,张金珠,张雪.油田应力测量[M]北京:地震出版社.1993:82-95.
• [8]Brudy M,Zobaek M D,Fuchs K,et al.Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes:implications for crustal strength[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1997,102(B8):18453-18475.
• [9]Chistiansson R.The latest development for in-situ rock stress measuring techniques[C]//Proceedings of the International Symposium on In-situ Rock Stress.Trondheim,Norway:[s.n.],2006:3-10.
• [10]陆树彬.地应力测试技术在冷家油田开发中的应用[J].特种油气藏,2004,11(增1):76-77,90.
• [11]张义元,魏庆芝.利用测井资料计算连续地应力剖面[J].大庆石油地质与开发,1993,12(2):61-65.
• [12]罗超文,刘允芳,景锋.水布垭工程地下厂房区三维地应力测试研究[J].长江科学院院报,1999,1(1):45-47
• [13]王建军.应用水压致裂法测量三维地应力的几个问题[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(2):229-233.
• [14]王靖涛.水压致裂法测量地应力的断裂力学方法[J].岩土力学,1982,3(1):1-12.
• [15]侯明勋,葛修润,王水林.水力压裂法地应力测量中的几个问题[J].岩土力学,2003,24(5):840-844.
• [16]王鸿勋.水力压裂原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1987:10-11.
• [17]Hudson J A,Cornet F H,Chistiansson R.ISRM suggested method for rock stress estimation—Part 1:Strategy for rock stress estimation[J].Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci,2003,40(7/8):991-998.