郭艳平
GUO Yanping

• 1:大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院

摘要(Abstract)：

为分析坳陷期张应力与构造反转期压扭性应力对丰乐地区葡萄花油层断裂发育与分布的双重影响,从断层断穿层位以及断层形成的应力环境出发,将断穿葡萄花油层不同时期的断层划分为油源断层和晚期调整型断层,结合这两类断裂系统的分形特征,分别刻画了油源断层和晚期调整型断层分维值。研究结果表明:丰乐地区油气有利区主要分布于油源断层分维值的高值区、晚期调整型断层分维值的低值区,即丰乐地区的西北部以及中部地区;而丰乐地区东部三肇凹陷—朝阳沟阶地地区,后期调整性断层的分维值较高,后期断裂活动较强,使得保存条件较差,不利于油气聚集成藏。这一认识不仅有力地指导了丰乐地区油气勘探,而且为周边含油气区寻找剩余油提供了借鉴。
In order to analyze the double influences of the tensile stress at the depression stage and compressoshear stress in tectonic reversal period on the fracture development and distribution in Putaohua oil reservoirs of Fengle area,from the viewpoint of the faulted horizons and the stress forming environments of the faults,the activating faults at different stages in the reservoirs were divided into the oil source fault and late-adjusted fault,integrated with the fractal characteristics of these two kinds of the fault,the dimension classifying values of them were respectively described. The study achievements show that the favorable blocks in Fengle area are mainly distributed in the high-value region of the fractal dimension in the oil source fault and the corresponding low-value area of the latter i. e. Northwest and Middle Fengle; while from Sanzhao Sag in East Fengle to Chaoyanggou Terrace,the values of the latter are rather higher,the activities of the late fractures are rather stronger,these make the conservationconditions rather worse and is not conducive to the accumulation of the oil and gas. This understanding can strongly guide the petroleum exploration in Fengle area,and moreover can provide the reference for the remained oil search in the surrounding hydrocarbon-bearing area.

关键词(KeyWords)： 丰乐地区;葡萄花油层;油源断层;晚期调整型断层;分形分维
Fengle area;Putaohua oil reservoir;oil source fault;late-adjusted fault;fractal dimension

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家重大科技专项“低渗、特低渗复杂油藏规模有效动用关键技术”(2017ZX05013-006)

作者(Author): 郭艳平
GUO Yanping

DOI: 10.19597/j.issn.1000-3754.201707041

参考文献(References)：

• [1]于水明,梅廉夫,施和生,等.珠江口盆地番禺低隆起—白云凹陷北坡断层与油气成藏关系[J].石油勘探与开发,2007,34(5):562-565.
• [2]邱燕,曾维军,李唐根.南海中、南部断裂体系及其构造意义[J].大地构造与成矿学,2005,29(2):166-175.
• [3]郭志强,王海学,赵政权,等.同向和反向断层形成机制及控圈作用差异性[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2017,36(3):1-6.
• [4]马骁骐,倪金龙,张凯,等.惠民凹陷临南洼陷T6反射层断裂分形特征与有利储层预测[J].油气地质与采收率,2015,22(1):52-56.
• [5]郭杜军.油源断裂与其他成藏要素空间匹配的控藏作用[J].大庆石油地质与开发,2017,36(3):39-43.
• [6]刘敬寿,杜全伟,戴俊生.金湖凹陷阜二段断裂信息维特征与油气藏分布[J].特种油气藏,2015,22(3):42-45.
• [7]李新琦,李慧勇,于海波,等.张家口—蓬莱断裂带渤海段断裂特征及其与油气差异成藏关系[J].油气地质与采收率,2016,23(5):16-49.
• [8]Mandelbort B B.The fractal geometry of nature[M].San Francisco:W.H.Feemanm,1982.
• [9]谢和平,Pariseau W G.岩石节理粗糙系数(JRC)的分形估计[J].中国科学:B辑化学,1994,38(5):524-530.
• [10]孔凡臣,丁国瑜.线性构造分数维值的含义[J].地震,1991(5):33-37.
• [11]易顺民,唐辉明.活动断裂的分形结构特征[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1995,20(1):58-62.
• [12]沈忠民,马祖钧,周光甲,等.断裂体系分维与油田分布[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,1995,20(1):73-78.
• [13]周新桂,孙宝珊,刘金红.辽河科尔康油田断裂分形特征与油气关系[J].地质力学学报,1997,3(1):81-87.
• [14]付晓飞,苏玉平,吕延防,等.断裂和裂缝的分形特征[J].地球科学——中国地质大学学报,2007,32(2):227-234.
• [15]何书,杨桥,王家鼎.黄骅坳陷中区断裂系统分形研究[J].大地构造与成矿学,2008,32(4):455-461.
• [16]冯阵东,戴俊生,邓航,等.利用分形几何定量评价克拉2气田裂缝[J].石油与天然气地质,2011,32(6):928-939.
• [17]陈颙,陈凌.分形几何学[M].北京:地震出版社,2005.
• [18]刘宝柱,孙万军,陈少军.松辽盆地南部中浅层油气藏的成藏史[J].石油实验地质,2003,26(1):55-51.
• [19]王德海,郭峰,任国选.辽河盆地东部凹陷北部地区断层对油气成藏的控制作用[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(4):1-5.
• [20]吕国祥,张瀛,王兴明,等.分形分维求取裂缝性岩石孔隙度指数m及应用[J].新疆石油天然气,2009,5(4):6-9.
• [21]郑红军.裂缝性储集层的分形分维应用研究[D].成都:西南石油学院,2003.
• [22]范存辉,陶佳丽,周坤,等.元坝中部断褶带须家河组裂缝分形特征[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2017,39(1):35-42.